Laid Off After 40

Laid Off After 40: Ageism…Between Truth and Consequences

May 12th, 2011

By Gwendolyn M. Ward, Principal at FOOW?

I spoke to a woman in her late 50’s who was humorously telling me about ending her 30-year marriage. Her husband had an affair and, after she confronted him, he asked her was she happily married prior to the discovery? She said, “Pretty much,” and he then confessed to having other affairs over the years; but since she was ‘pretty much’ happy, then why divorce?

She was stunned by his revelation and even more shocked when the majority of her friends agreed with him. Her friends told her that she had a great house, luxury cars, and three successful adult children. Why rock the boat? Why change at her age? Why throw away 30 years? Why start over?

She questioned why change in her 50’s was labeled as starting over. Why couldn’t it just be change? A divorce didn’t negate her successes prior to it; she was still a loving and supportive parent, caring daughter, and a successful executive. She loved her husband but not at the cost of her self-respect; he wasn’t her life but a part of it.

To her, the divorce was a change in course while moving forward. It was not an ending point where she needed to start over. In other words, she hired movers to move her husband out because she was moving on.  

I think about her when I am conversing with people over 50 who claim ageism when they are forced » Read more: Laid Off After 40: Ageism…Between Truth and Consequences

Back to Top

Laid Off After 40: Why You’re Not Too Old

March 17th, 2011

By Katrina Robinson

You’re not too old to be in the job-hunting arena. It doesn’t matter if you’re thirty, forty, fifty, or  reaching sixty—more and more career-minded people find themselves scouring the job markets looking for a new position. You’re not alone!

Whether you’ve reached the end of your tenure at your previous company, you’re burned out in your current career path, are having financial issues that call for a change, or are simply dissatisfied with your career, you can successfully find a new job by taking the necessary steps. Here are some tips to consider if you’re looking for a new job:

  • If you’re not sure if you were in the right industry to begin with, try a few career assessment tests. If you feel as though you’re in the wrong career but have no idea what job path you’d like to take, these tests can help to assess your skills and interests and may help you discover the ideal job for you. 
  • Don’t rush into anything. Take some time to evaluate each potential job opening, and carefully deliberate » Read more: Laid Off After 40: Why You’re Not Too Old

Back to Top

Q & A: The Old Ageism Debate

October 20th, 2010

By Joe Redshaw

There has been a ton of traffic on sites about ageism. With retirement extending, the large number of over 40 people unemployed why aren’t businesses interested in experienced workers? I have to think the salary savings is short sighted – why don’t employers think of the opportunity cost of getting the more inexperienced worker trained and up-to-speed?

This is a tough one. I am just offering up some suggestions and maybe playing some devil’s advocate here. I don’t necessarily believe all of the following, but some might…

Inexperienced workers (which I think is the PC way of saying younger) may work longer hours, be willing to learn new things and of course are paid less than more experienced workers (PC for older individuals). Some experienced workers (in some people’s opinions) are not willing to learn new things, can be set in their ways, often more demanding with money, time off and other things around the office. Often experienced workers have stayed too long in one technology or skill. Therefore they are going to need to be trained as well. So from a company’s perspective, if both need to be trained, get the lower paid individual. Companies should really be looking at best fit for the job and not age. And I think most do this

Will the pushing out of retirement by both the government and workers who can no longer » Read more: Q & A: The Old Ageism Debate

Back to Top