<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter:  The 25 most influential recruiters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nejs.org/2010/03/01/twitter-the-25-most-influential-recruiters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nejs.org/2010/03/01/twitter-the-25-most-influential-recruiters/</link>
	<description>Produced by job seekers, for job seekers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:50:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik Palmer</title>
		<link>http://nejs.org/2010/03/01/twitter-the-25-most-influential-recruiters/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 17:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nejs.org/?p=2831#comment-416</guid>
		<description>WeFollow is a good site for finding folks and running through lits, but I find that some of their rankings are not very accurate.  Specifically I think their Timeliness (recent &amp; frequency) is not really adjusted for.     But, a VERY good list.    You also might want to look at MrTweet, Twitter Grader, and other evaluation services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WeFollow is a good site for finding folks and running through lits, but I find that some of their rankings are not very accurate.  Specifically I think their Timeliness (recent &amp; frequency) is not really adjusted for.     But, a VERY good list.    You also might want to look at MrTweet, Twitter Grader, and other evaluation services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

